C. Gardiner: I got a chuckle out of your post. I tend to be critical of people who post without proof reading what they write ( I used to write for a daily paper and I'm also an "old" teacher of English, but I notice with the advent of the internet/iphone, people (me too) just keyboard away and hope they are readable - at least that's my excuse). Enough said. Glad you read my post, or is it red?

To the topic at hand: K posted - "Debate is what enriches us all, Ed, and with that in mind I seem to detect a bit of animosity towards Cliffs."

Cliffs has given many of us the opportunity to get richer, if not downright rich. However, they have their fingers in many pies and I wonder about their many acquisitions. They make money and how they do it seems to be legal. Recently I bought into a property (an eventual ten bagger I'm told) in which I didn't even know they were involved (poor DD on my part). Knowing their track record with SPQ and KWG - on the cheap - I maybe can expect a three or four bagger. It is a gold prospect.

Most who post here seem to think Cliffs is only interested in the ROF's cromite. If NOT's nickle is as good as some think don't count Cliffs out for going after it!!

Gleegee.