Man, talk about a statement from someone who lays claim to an intimate knowledge of what?

Firstly, he makes a comparison of the ROF to a gold mining camp. How does that compare in any way to the ROF?

He also compares the inaccessability of the ROF to Kirkland Lake, which was only accessible by rail???

He then goes on to describe the various agencies that are in place to supposedly create roadblocks to development nowadays, but in fact are there to facilitate a proper and environmentally clean operation.

Then he finishes up by describing the mountains of (slag?) created in Kirkland lake that have now disappeared by the actions of Mother nature. I paraphrase (slag), as I have a hard time envisioning slag as a byproduct of gold mining, at least in the sense that I understand the word. At any rate if nature can accomodate the results of mining under those conditions in those days, we should have no problems with todays standards.

Best regards

k