" It would have been better if they had broken the subject into detailed sections and introduced their readers to the ROF that way."

Their bias was obvious from the opening including the title which has nefarious connotations. They clearly state they have no interest in it and that they intend not to. Odd to have a close door perspective without an open door perspective on an area which is receiving considerable investment of money time and attention from biz and Gov't. After reading a few brief lines they have created the intended flavour towards NOT. Again, it would seem clear that they want their readers to invest in other things. They state a lot of things and omit a lot of others. Not a complete story as you say. Just what they feel you "should" know.