hi lar,

like you to consider the underneath:

this was written in the G&M

"In exchange for its services, Agoracom collected a monthly fee and stock options in each of the companies it represented, the OSC said, and the stock options were equal to 250,000 shares or 0.5 per cent of the firm's stock. The OSC alleged Agoracom stood to gain from the online postings, since they could induce other clients to sign up, and to increase the value of its own options. “Neither the public users nor Agoracom's clients were aware that representatives of Agoracom were posting on their hubs using aliases,” the OSC alleged in the documents. “In fact, [Agoracom] knowingly deceived clients about the traffic and activity generated on their hubs.”

i also like you to remember that George cum suis was also trying very hard to get a certian amount of control in noront during the last days of mr. nemis being director. i happen to know that agora employees even wanted an office in the noront office during those days.

don't you think that everybody has a right to fully know what influenced their financial situation on the shares they bought?

why should that been cut out after the weekend?

don't agree lar with your previous post, i think a lot of people lost a lot of money because of this pumping. the fact that they didn't know doesn't mean they shouldn't know, wouldn't you agree?

i probably will be banned again like before and my post will be deleted like yesterday but nothing of the above could violate any of the agora rules since this is all out in the open and just mentioning what is known.

cheers roos