Why NOT change the offer 1 more time?

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

karchdog1310

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 2892 [?]

Votes: 145 Score: 3.0 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Why NOT change the offer 1 more time?

posted on Dec 05, 2009 11:06AM

I would be more willing to Tender my shares to NOT if they would amend the deal to include a new FWR. It has either been stated or implied the only thing NOT is interested in is the ROF assets. If they are just going to give the other freewest properties away, like windfall, just let the current FWR share holders keep them.

I for one would prefer to turn down both offers and see the 43-101 as well as more FWR drill results around AT12. Second choice would be to tender my shares to NOT. CLiffs offer is way to low for 50+ years of production.