No such message found

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Hole 64
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Re: FWR NOT Agreement
2
curt22go
Nov 18, 2009 11:22AM
ANY IDEA'S ON NEXT NR
6
rockstar
Nov 18, 2009 11:49AM
Re: FWR NOT Agreement
4
stock greed
Nov 18, 2009 11:53AM
Re: ANY IDEA'S ON NEXT NR
7
retiredrookie
Nov 18, 2009 12:01PM
Hole 46
1
stock greed
Nov 18, 2009 12:05PM
Re: FWR NOT Agreement---Frank, I think you are wrong about this.
13
DarlingofBayStreet
Nov 18, 2009 12:10PM
Are Wes and Mac new at takeover games?
6
stock greed
Nov 18, 2009 12:16PM
Icon president Re: ANY IDEA'S ON NEXT NR
22
Milsy1
Nov 18, 2009 12:16PM
Re: Hole 46
1
curt22go
Nov 18, 2009 12:19PM
Re: Hole 64
1
stock greed
Nov 18, 2009 12:22PM

It is an unreported hole. Might be a deep one as Hoov sort of inducated as to maybe that is why it is taking longer. Some seem to believe it could be a very good hole and they are holding back in a way to report it as the ace... That is what I have gotten out of the posts over the last few weeks about it anyways.. Hope that helps.. TTY

4 Recommendations
Re: ANY IDEA'S ON NEXT NR
4
bushmills
Nov 18, 2009 02:14PM
Re: CORRECTION Hole 64
1
rockstar
Nov 18, 2009 02:20PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply