I jump on it because it is a misrepresentation to the uninformed regarding precious metals.
It is one thing if I due to incompitance or deliberate intent state on this forum something inappropriate, it is something else when it is done by a company executive, cloaking it with a word like "Potential" for the TSE people so that it will fly past them.
The fact here is that due to desperation a company is stooping down to the border line with regard to ethical behaviour and we, on forums such as this one, should not only recognize it but be against such representations.

Just how often have posters on this forum after posting honest opinions been raked over hot coals. Now how often about misrepresentations?That should go double when it comes to company executives and double again if done by them through public statements.

Note another comparison - Noront has gold and silver in their Eagle's nest. Initially they reported their small content in drill results BUT ( my conclusion ) because the grades of those metals were too low to be economicly practical they have been dropped from recent drill reports.
( A very ethical action imo.)

The issue here is not whether a particular metal is economical to process but that of misrepresenting an uneconomical content to the extent that the uninformed swallow the idea that it is economical, a practical resource, and a source of a qualitative argument of a company's assets.

To me it is a false representation to counter Noront's precious metal content in their chromite body, the quality of Noront's chromite ore and the 'Discovery' of a gold resource.

It results from desperation.

So I question - Why is it that this forum for all practical purposes is mum about the inclusion of the PM content in that news release.