HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Do I sense a new trend? - Valuations.
6
Nov 02, 2009 09:48AM

No company waits until the entire resource has been mined to recieve their payoff. Which is why resouces are generally sold at a percentage of their gross in-ground value. For example, if we have a resource which can be mined over 100 years, it might be reasonable to only take into account perhaps the first ten or twenty years of production when calculating a rough "value". Subtract costs of infrastructure, mining, transport, taxes, interest, acquisition etc. plus a percentage for actual profit, then you might have a ballpark figure.

So no-one(I hope) expects any exploration company to see anything like the total gross in-ground value of any deposit they find. With gold for example, they might realise 10% to 20% depending on things like location in a stable country, existing infrastructure, ease and costs of extraction and so on. With chromite things are less clear-cut with little precedent for any deposit even close in size and grade to those in the ROF area.

Who knows, 3%?1%? Still formidable numbers when you start with a big number like $300billion.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply