Re: Cliffs?(correction to rapidrob reply to geoprof)

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

rapidrob

Rank: President [?]

Points: 13659 [?]

Votes: 240 Score: 3.5 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Cliffs?(correction to rapidrob reply to geoprof)

in response to

Re: Cliffs?

rapidrob

posted on Oct 31, 2009 06:01PM

My apologies for not picking up this posting error. In the last sentence of the second paragraph it CLF and NOT were reversed, it is CLF that would have shot itself in the foot by not attemting to secure FWR at a lower level if the combined a combined FWR/NOT were to trade higher than current levels.

8 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply