No such message found

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Triple J - Hoov. - Addendum.
12
Oct 27, 2009 10:51PM
34
Oct 27, 2009 11:04PM
12
Oct 27, 2009 11:11PM
13
Oct 27, 2009 11:17PM
17
Oct 28, 2009 12:27AM

I have been scratching my head since the previous post and I suspect I know what you meant.
Sub-par to you is below what is typical/average for gold intercepts.
I will agree that is so on hole 39. The others while not spectacular are quite typical.
Could you be classifying based on other holes than just these four. If so then I would have to agree with your label.
To me it is not the actual intercept values that are important because only the valuable ones would be exploited and the not so would be left for higher gold prices in the distant future.
What is important, as many already are surmising, is that we have another resource that shows potential. Just how many do we must have before we reach nirvana?

22
Oct 28, 2009 07:53AM
15
Oct 28, 2009 07:56AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply