The porblem with both your musings on potential Tonage on Eagle1 B & C is that both you are Working from a Conversation Piece someone raised at the time of the Luncheon. Someone who is/are not directly related with the Company. Thus, Pure Speculation on their part.

What needs to be kept in mind when TRYING to recon what the Size of these two lenses (or these two intercepts of the Eagle1 Conduit, should this actually be the case, and if eventually being proven so, which will be determined relatively quickly if the New Geophysicals are in fact useful, as they very well should be) is the nature of the Host Rock in which these two lenses are actually hosted.

Given the information released from the Fall 2007 Drilling of Eagle1, now referred to as Eagle1 A, the Conduit was presumed to be lost in Post Implacement Shear Faulting, or in in the Host Grandorite (check the spelling???) that was severely affected by Pre Implacement Shear Faulting. Either which way, it is more likely that the Magma causing the Mineral Implacement came from WITHIN the Granadorite, AND NOT from the OVERLYING Country Rock to the South. This is supported by the findings of PRB's drilling early in 2008.

Thus, doing your DREAM GUESSING, as you are currently doing is but a FUN Game.

If in fact these two new lenses (Eagle1 B & C) are in Fact LENSES, guessing their shape using but One Dimention is pure Guessing if you are a very experienced Geologist. Imaginative Dreaming if not. Drilling more holes into them will greatly assist both you two and the Professional Geologists at Noront Resources.

Thus, at present, your time speculating would be much more productive if the FOCUS of the Speculation was oriented to Speculation on IF Eagle1 B & C are in fact part of the Eagle1 Conduit AND If having Rediscovered the Conduit at Depth, will they, while proving up their Size (determining their Dimentions), go on to loate the FEEDER(s) that gave rise to these two Lenses. AND also NOTE that id these Two Lenses are proven to in fact be Lenses, how likely would it be that they are the ONLY Two Lenses PRODUCED by the Eagle1 Conduit? Otherwise, if they are PROVEN to be simply a CONTINUATION of the Eagle1 Conduit, WHERE is it that this Conduit CAME FROM?

Old Joe

PS: Assay Results take EXTREMELY Little Time in the overall Time Frame involved in Reporting Assay Results!!! !!! !!! !!!