Re: Peter Hodson vs Peter Smith

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Polylabel

Rank: President [?]

Points: 18518 [?]

Votes: 328 Score: 3.3 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Peter Hodson vs Peter Smith

in response to

Peter Hodson vs Peter Smith

amosburke

posted on Aug 07, 2009 05:25PM

Smith was talking about the lengths of interception and not the assays. His point being if this can be hit on step out it could be huge deposit. Some people are looking at overall grade and comparing to assays on the hugely rich initial hit on E1.