Re: What next? ( From_Sudbury re WINDFALL)...
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 23, 2009 10:47PM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
jacki79 you write...."It looks like Windfall is over for us...See the following email correspondence. :-("
you then make reference to her email in which she states the following....
"Hi Jackie. Hope all is well.
"In the third quarter, the Company completed phase 1 work at the Windfall Lake. The results
of this work have been compiled and Windfall Lake has been put on care and maintenance
with all work at the site halted for the winter. Results from the Phase 1 underground
exploration program were inadequate for Windfall to merit further exploration at this time.
The Company continues to examine alternatives at Windfall and how it can best benefit the
Company."
Now, she wants us to believe that is all there is.....someone is now going to spend a few million to explore this area given the above and nothing more.
You would think she could have at least spelled Windfall right
How much more of this must we endure?