HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: One final thought that's been running around in my head...

"Now, 50 X 50 meter conduit leading to a pool of sulfides somewhere, that might be interesting....."

Now that would be so nice now would'nt it Herb.

Try this on for size:

Posted by: pw on March 07, 2008 02:49AM

In response to: Re: Ring of Fire Luncheon -... by fairchij

"A question to all the great geos on board, does a deep, wide conduit, as described by Malcolm, possibly, probably, or typically contain rich mineralizations also? "

"If it is, then some of these deep, 500m wide conduits can potentially be worth more than the VB (Ovoid is about 800m x 500m)."

Now, hold on, 500m wide conduit?, that's a stretch, or is it? There's no telling how wide this conduit is until proven up.On the subject of size matters, mineralization within the lengths of the conduit(s) between pools could prove to be quite fruitful.

We should get utm's, dip, and azimuth in the next release hopefully. would it be unreasonable to request such info from NOT?

Regards

Rob

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply