HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Raw Metal Extrapolations, have they defined the limits? motives
13
Jun 17, 2009 10:10PM
47
Jun 18, 2009 05:04AM
3
Jun 18, 2009 05:27AM
3
Jun 18, 2009 06:02AM
31
Jun 18, 2009 06:04AM
2
Jun 18, 2009 06:25AM
14
Jun 18, 2009 06:39AM
19
CMP
Jun 18, 2009 06:55AM

Re: Raw Metal Extrapolations, have they defined the limits? motives

posted on Jun 18, 2009 07:34AM

Yes I support FWR. I am getting tired of Joe and mungall saying Cu Ni are the only thing that will make it go up there. Well does Not have a partner in Cliffs, have any companies come forward to take out Not since last years discovery? (absence is evidence)I am tired of Not incesent bashing of chromite (but yet they are drilling it!!) in favour of their back pocket base metal deposit. You guys have even commented on that here on numerous occasions. I'd like to see all get along up there cause that is what it will take. Not a Not attitude that my toys are better than yours. And I guess if you don't like my motives you guys can exercise your Obamatinian titles and delete me

5
Jun 18, 2009 12:40PM
4
djo
Jun 18, 2009 01:07PM
7
Jun 18, 2009 03:58PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply