HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: I posted this on the FWR board

I posted this on the FWR board

posted on Apr 29, 2009 05:49PM

Re: FWR vs NOT...the gloves are off...and why is that JD

posted on Apr 29, 09 09:40PM

Jd,

You are always quick to go after other posters for putting non factual information on these boards.

Would you care to elaborate, with some factual proof regarding your following statements?

1)From reading the various posts recently, and watching the recent "actions" by NOT, I have come to a conclusion that the gloves are off between these 2...

What factual posts and what recnt actions?

2) this BOD was laying back relying solely on the potential of finding more MMS NiCuPges ,

I guess the 100 or so holes they have drilled at the BBs means nothing.


3)They came out fighting at this "luncheon" stating that their Chrome is much higher grade than FWR, and promised new MMS deposits to be announced soon..

Was this said to you at the luncheon, because nothing like this was said on the presentation,So far I have listened to it twice.

4).NOT has had almost 2 years of drilling in numerous areas and has been promising to come up with next MMS

Were these promoses in a news release I missed?

5),NOT, keep bragging about Eagle 1, MMS and keep quoting the Billions it'sworth.

Was this in another news release I missed?


6).How can they possibly claim superiority in Chrome deposist is beyond reason..

When/where did they do this?

7) but for NOT to suggest they have more and better grades of Chrome than FWR, is really stretching the "truth"

When/where did they do this?


8)I am of the view that NOT realized that it was well behind in ROF sentiment, and so came out and attemted to badmouth FWR, on rather frivolous accusations,

When/where did thewy do this?

9)Whatever it is they tried to do, has FAILED miserably, as FWR was up to 31.5 and NOT was down 3 cents at 74 and heading lower....One thing that can be said from this evidence is that FWR came out the BIG winner for the day... Let's see how this further develops when more "FACTS" come out...

What evidence are you referring too?

Thats what I would like to see.....when you give me some facts.

BTW I hold both FWR and NOT, and for the life of me, I cannot understand why

some posters are trying to establish an alleged battle between the two companies

I will post this on the NOT board as well, as it appears a number of us own both stocks.

RR

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply