Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

rosehill

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 7542 [?]

Votes: 265 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: 52.30 oz/t gold @ Windfall and not worth pursuing?? Makes you wonder! eom

posted on Feb 17, 2009 05:28AM

obg,

Windfall failed to deliver. It does not matter what words are used to describe the situation.

"Place under care and maintenance."

"We will look at when the market is more favorable."

Windfall failed to produce the results necessary to continue the operation in this current market environment. The company is not playing games with investors. IMHO if Windfall showed signs of readily accessible gold we would be working on this project. Windfall is of no value to us at the moment. It's nice to state 52.30 grams per ton but the reality is it's not there. As an investor in NOT Windfall is dead in my eyes.