HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: NOT vs FWR-Rook
16
Jan 27, 2009 01:06PM
15
Jan 27, 2009 01:15PM

Re: NOT vs FWR-Rook

in response to by
posted on Jan 27, 2009 01:31PM

Welcome to the forum, Rook. Is that short for rookie or are you a chess master? the latter would be good because you either need to be a master or a clairvoyant to answer your question. In my opinion, there is not enough information on FWR or NOT to make a choice of one over the other based on chromite. FWR has vigorously promoted it's thickness and grades whereas NOT has not said much to get you excited. I have been agonizing on where to invest along with many others and the only decision I can see is to invest in both. I am partial to NOT for the Ni/Cu/PGE's and lately for the chromite due to the companies recent decision to focus on that resource. Also because NOT has both which provides synergistic infrastructure needs. You say you have been a long term reader so you should look back at allthe due diligence that many qualified and knowledgeable posters have provided.

Best of Luck

Mike

4
Jan 27, 2009 04:02PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply