First, we get vauge statements with regards to Windfall suggesting it's not as good as first thought.....however, such comments are made lacking such evidence as assay results for the W-3 area

Now, we get statements suggesting that Windfall is indeed uneconomical.....again, lacking any hard evidence....what we have here is hearsay

In addition, let's suppose that it is in fact uneconomical.....at what gold price is it economical? Seems to me, much of the capital outlays has already been spent....at this stage, it would seem a pick and shovel could make this economical to some degree.

If this is in fact uneconomical, let's see it in black and white, confirmed by management in a press release.... with signatures....and supported with assay results.....

I am concerned that we may see a sale of Windfall without disclosing to shareholders what the true value is....the silence with respect to the assay results is suspicious