still need FNC for a mine?

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

stock greed

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 7947 [?]

Votes: 218 Score: 3.1 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

still need FNC for a mine?

posted on Jan 23, 2009 07:54AM

Does NOT have enough for a mine now, or do we still need FNC to strike as well. Do we have enough leverage to be ballsey? And does anyone know if our new president is good at negotiation tactics? What's his history?

How does At12 bode for FNC? I think we all still need to hope and pray P.Smith of FNC is a good enough Geologist to strike -then FNC and NOT will have something to negotiate with the majors. Still, perhaps with KWG's partnering and this NOT's new find, the Majors may begin to realize their stalling time is running out and they had better get proposals on the table quickly before their opportunities for buyout or JV development with us run out.

2 Recommendations

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Please to post a reply