HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Chromite... some thoughts on existing potential for FW&NOT
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Re: Tangi, FWR better then NOT, NOT
6
notster
Nov 26, 2008 03:30PM
Re: Tangi, FWR better then NOT, NOT
4
Sum4All
Nov 26, 2008 05:14PM
Chromite... some thoughts on existing potential for FW&NOT
4
notster
Nov 26, 2008 06:25PM
Re: Chromite... some thoughts on existing potential for FW&NOT
16
Polylabel
Nov 27, 2008 04:14AM

Yes Poly, completely agree on the exploration agreement, as we have one in place between the NOT and FWR for the JV property top left hand corner of FW claim 3011028 it would not be a stretch to theorize that given the current market for juniors and Chromite in general NOT and FW would seek to to do just that.

1 Recommendations
Financing
1
rago1
Nov 27, 2008 05:38AM
Re: Financing
1
Deeter
Nov 27, 2008 05:56AM
Re: Tangi, FWR better then NOT, NOT
3
Deeter
Nov 27, 2008 06:36AM
Re: Financing
3
rago1
Nov 27, 2008 07:24AM
Re: Financing
4
Highgrader
Nov 27, 2008 07:37AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply