"The issue is can the current board handle this company in its current state and make it grow. NO. This is not about there geo's there the best around. the land is amazing, the JV are great this is all about leadership and I think we have the wrong CEO in place right now."

Nice try but it really is blather not backed up by much of anything.... but I do give you credit for your patience. Firstly a company is like a country. It has a leader who is really just a director supported by many talents from all areas of human endeavour. NOT has a leader or president who equally relies on our top notch geos, corporate/financial people and all manner of support staff. It is truly amazing how many back-seat drivers come out of the woodwork when it serves their interest or agenda. It's beginning to sound like a presidential election with a whole chorus of voices screaming loudly about nothing they truly have answers too, but don't they still scream loudly. This whole farce was baked right from the beginning. Had we not hit Cr, would we be having this discussion?..... I doubt it! They speak of our inability to promote the nickel interest, when really it's the Cr they really want. Definite distraction technique.... "lets not say too much about the Cr because there is nothing negative there and we don't want to arouse the Cr giants, the ones whom we haven't lined up as friends".