HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Why is all of RoF rushing to do VTEM' s?

Good advice, I DO trust the geos running the program. They are the ones responsible for Hole #5 and hopefully will find us more of the same down the line.

I guess I'm just a little confused about the chromite, after it was explained my geological understanding was inconsistent, which it seems to be.

If I re-arrange my thinking then, based on the subsequent posts, then in my mind, it seems that if they find a seam of chromite, great! But don't bother drilling one centimeter deeper on the chromite discovery because that's all that is likely to be there? Just an over-simplified way of asking to see if I've got this right...???

While I fully understand that companies do not drill "blind", and drill according to the best data they have on hand to ensure success, that is where I earlier pondered the question about utilizing the already-drilled holes to try to detect mineralization down-hole as opposed to starting at the surface.

But I know no-one can answer that right now, but it does make for some interesting discussion.

GLTAL







Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply