Good advice, I DO trust the geos running the program. They are the ones responsible for Hole #5 and hopefully will find us more of the same down the line.

I guess I'm just a little confused about the chromite, after it was explained my geological understanding was inconsistent, which it seems to be.

If I re-arrange my thinking then, based on the subsequent posts, then in my mind, it seems that if they find a seam of chromite, great! But don't bother drilling one centimeter deeper on the chromite discovery because that's all that is likely to be there? Just an over-simplified way of asking to see if I've got this right...???

While I fully understand that companies do not drill "blind", and drill according to the best data they have on hand to ensure success, that is where I earlier pondered the question about utilizing the already-drilled holes to try to detect mineralization down-hole as opposed to starting at the surface.

But I know no-one can answer that right now, but it does make for some interesting discussion.

GLTAL