Re: is it bad or good no visuals on AT12?

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

stranger

Rank: President [?]

Points: 2165 [?]

Votes: 117 Score: 3.4 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: is it bad or good no visuals on AT12?

in response to

is it bad or good no visuals on AT12?

southendboy

posted on Aug 11, 2008 10:59AM

I have a feeling that they want to be 100% certain when they start putting out visuals as they could be good,but still need the conformation of an assay.

All eyes are on Mcfaulds ,so I'm guessing they wont want any false starts so assays is what we will get.So when it starts to move,it should be for real and no chance of mistake.

Thats also why I'm still looking at Probe as only round 1 of drilling and assays can still tell us something.