HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Stating the obvious...

Stating the obvious...

posted on Aug 08, 2008 06:05AM

I am sure you guys realize that if FNC hits, PRB will also move sharply higher given the proximity and the geological setting - FNC's and PRB's claims, and NOT's E1 are all part of the same mineralized system. Therefore, a hit by FNC will be very strong evidence that Cu-Ni sulphides are the cause of the EM anomaly lurking beneath the peridotite on PRB MFW claims.

I would argue that PRB is far from dead money. Unlike BMK, its too close to the action...

I don't even want to think about what will happen if FNC drills into something that is not Cu-Ni sulphides, or something of similar value. I think NOT, FNC, and PRB will be hit hard, NOT will recover, but some of the shine and mysteryy of the McFauld's Lake story will be gone...


Regards,

B.

2
Aug 08, 2008 06:09AM
3
Aug 08, 2008 06:17AM
26
Aug 08, 2008 07:36AM
12
Aug 08, 2008 07:51AM
10
Aug 08, 2008 08:22AM
6
Aug 08, 2008 08:27AM
2
Aug 08, 2008 01:39PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply