Hey Coswil......in reference to your observation below,

"When this all started there was a statement made by Mungal that the high nickel contentent that NOT found was a clear indicator that there is a extremely high mineralization source out there. It was stated that what NOT found was not the feeder. ANd that for there to be such a high grade the source had to be tremendous. Well we have not yet found the source, but that does not mean it isn't out there. It has to be out there as it is the source."

I don't have the original Mungal statement, but if memory serves me well, he was making the point that for a deposit as rich as E1, this meant that an enormous amount of 'magma' had to have passed thru.....not that the magma itself was high grade, in other words the magma could have been medium or low grade.....and got deposited at E1 adding up to high grade over time.

This of course doesn't mean that there is or isn't a motherload.....if there is, the grade just might not be up to E1 richness.

I enjoy your posts......regards & cheers.....sambone