HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Consider what 'Major' has to consider
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Consider what 'Major' has to consider
14
Polylabel
Jul 30, 2008 12:36PM
Re: Consider what 'Major' has to consider
21
rapidrob
Jul 30, 2008 01:04PM
Re: Consider what 'Major' has to consider
1
rapidrob
Jul 30, 2008 01:19PM
Re: Consider what 'Major' has to consider
6
Polylabel
Jul 30, 2008 01:23PM
Re: Consider what 'Major' has to consider
1
pinetree1
Jul 30, 2008 01:32PM
Re: Consider what 'Major' has to consider
2
rapidrob
Jul 30, 2008 01:37PM

No bash at all- common sense says another issue below $2.00 on the heels of one that is seriously and recently under water does not work. I love PNP's conceptual model- but they need a demonstrable market win to keep going. NOT is as good as it gets from what I see in their portfolio.

1 Recommendations
Re: Everyone on the board is calculating Not's-----
6
happyappie6
Jul 30, 2008 04:20PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply