That IS interesting, jimmymac. At least now we know for sure that we won't get to see it, although some here, were in attendance (I guess all those posts have been removed now). All these recent actions by the OSC must be for a reason. And that reason has to be the 43-101 and the move to the TSX, IMO.

And so I guess that RN can't say anymore, "we got a real barnburner". To us, anyways. That's fine. I'll play along. I already know that we have a couple of barnburners because two eagles have landed.

And now, we hear a rumor, from miss kealp, that drilling may be starting next week, on that new JV with FWR. You know, the anomaly that resembles Eagle One, only it appears to be possibly bigger. What happens if we hit some more good grades there ? I can only imagine that we'll see a spike in the SP, to the high $7's again, at least. And that's a modest assumption, if the grades are similar to Eagle One.

But there's a down side to everything. And although it doesn't bother me in the least, that my postings are usually positive, maybe it's time for me to say something not so positive.

Here goes :

Why is it taking so long to get assay reports, reported in an NR ? There have been several discussions on this and I'm speaking of the time, after the foul-up at SGS Labs. That was a while back, since we received that batch of assays. There were still more to come from SGS, we were told. Where the heck are they ? And for the past several weeks, we've been waiting to hear something back from the new lab. Is it really taking this long, or is there some other reason for the delay. The OSC ? The PP guys ? Or are the labs and the entire assaying process just taking a lot longer than in 2007. I guess that it just bugs me that it takes 2-3 days to drill a hole, another day or two to ship the drill core to the assay lab and then 2-3 months to get the assays back. Something's wrong with that chain of events. Much better service is needed, IMO.

And that's my only beef with this entire NOT-Saga.

strato-beef