points made about the WSR news.

No one knows what is what until we get the assays back. The facts are also that UC, due south east of this new drilling, have hit massive sulphides but I don't think they hit any nickel, only copper. Massive sulphides do not mean nickel. I think it is a bit silly to be upset that the possibility is that this massive sulphide may be copper and zinc. Whatever the content, massive sulphides are good! At least that is what I think geoprof was saying.

I hope its nickel and palladium and gold and silver and platinum all wrapped up with a big bow, but until we get the assays I think dissecting the description of the core is a, if not productive, an interesting discussion without getting ones pants in a wrinkle because of one geologist's opinion versus another. If we take this tact then I ask each of our experts, are you willing to put your reputation on a definitive interpretation at this time? If not, then lets not argue about hypotheticals, but lets not let that keep you from proposing your hypotheticals either.

BK.