HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: "Significantly Lower"
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
"Significantly Lower"
43
Been There
May 03, 2008 08:08AM
Re: "Significantly Lower"
1
Been There
May 03, 2008 08:10AM
Re: "Significantly Lower"
4
sambone
May 03, 2008 08:24AM
Re: "Significantly Lower"
8
Babaoriley
May 03, 2008 08:29AM
Re: "Significantly Lower"
3
readyset
May 03, 2008 08:39AM
Re: "Significantly Lower"
17
PM
May 03, 2008 08:51AM

Hey babaoriley......I get your point....but.... I was referring to Been There's point about the unknown starting point with this set of assays.....not speculating in general.....see BT's point below

"WE have absolutely no way of knowing what the real assays should have been or what they were measured at (e.g. it could be 0.1g/t when it should have been 0.125g/t or it could be 10 g/t when it should be 10.25g/t). Anything else is PURE speculation."

..cheers.....sambone

5 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply