The "FACTS" for JD...
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 25, 2008 08:53AM
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Well John, since you like to deal in "FACTS", as you often state, never mind what Iwas told by Noront, the fact is you stated:
"First we need to keep in mind that until and unless these assay results come in, all the Geological/Geophysical etc work comes to a halt on the ground, since these assay results are specifically used to further the "puzzle" of those deposits, and without them ,it would be extremely difficult to continue putting sai "ore puzzle" together...SO that would explain to some extent the delays in Geo/drilling updates...."
When the NR stated:
"As announced on March 25, 2008, resource studies at the Eagle One have
commenced but this work, as well as progress on the anomaly drilling, has
been hampered by this extremely lengthy turn-around time for drill core
sample analysis. This is due to the current heavy demand on the
Analytical Laboratories. To alleviate the slow turn - around time for
assays, the Company has entered into an agreement with Activation
Laboratories ("ActLabs"), headquartered in Ancaster, Ontario, whereby
ActLabs will provide priority processing to the Company in exchange for a
$200,000 advance payment used by ActLabs to construct a new lab facility
in Thunder Bay, Ontario."
First, nowhere does it state the assay delays have had any impact on the geophysics. Do you now deny that you stated that all geophysical work would have been halted as a result of these delays?
Second, you say that work has been "halted, when the NR clearly states that only progess anomaly drilling has been hampered.
It seems to me that the meaning of what you said is significantly different than what was stated in the NR. You include geophysics, when there no mention of that, and you also mention all geological work, when clearly the NR does not state that all geological work has bee halted - only that progress on anomaly drilling has been hampered.
So, never mind what I was told by Noront, those are the "FACTS, as you so like to put it.
It seems things always beome silly arguments for you when you no longer wish to debate them because you know that you what you say is wrong, or not completely correct, and I find that quite disturbing.
The bottom line is that work is continuing and progressing at Mc Fauld's Lake.
Regards,
B.