Re: Eagle 3 folks!!!
in response to
by
HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"
NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)
Message: Re: Eagle 3 folks!!!
4
Apr 03, 2008 08:00AM
Below is a table of an old Genuity report, in addition of QQ's fine research on the Noront targets.
I took the liberty of calling target B "Eagle three" and replacing "untested" with "Confirmed". I suppose no one will mind. :)
Again a very thank you QQ for sharing a lot of information (even confidential) with this board. In time's of trouble QQ-girl comes to me speaking words of wisdom, sounds familiar? - All greetz from Belgium, Helium
EM Target |
Distance from Eagle One | Length and Relative Conductor Strength | Comments |
| Eagle One | NA | 300m; strong-mod | Confirmed - Near surface massive sulphides documented |
| A | 4.7km | 100m; strong-mod | Untested – small EM conductor |
| B or "Eagle three" | 4.3km | 400m; strong-mod | Confirmed - largest EM target based on Channel 3 |
| C or “Eagle Two | 2.0km | 200m; strong-mod | Confirmed – as a sulphide source conductor |
| D | 0.9km | 150m; strong-mod | Untested – on N-S property boundary with Fancamp |
| E | 1.2km | <100m; moderate-wk | Untested – small EM target |
| F | 2.0km | <100m; weak | Untested – small, weak EM target |
| G | 3.2km | <100m; weak | Untested – small, weak EM target |
| H | 3.2km | >50m; Moderate? | Untested – partial expression of conductor? Straddles Fancamp boundary? |
| I | 5.3km | >200m?; strong-mod? | Untested – partial expression of EM target? Straddles MacDonald Mines / Temex property boundary? |
21 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply