correction: rodg45: Visible copper sulphides is not the same as visible copper..

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Bentonstocks

Rank: President [?]

Points: 6383 [?]

Votes: 291 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

correction: rodg45: Visible copper sulphides is not the same as visible copper..

in response to

Re: rodg45: Visible copper sulphides is not the same as visible copper...

Bentonstocks

posted on Apr 02, 2008 02:22PM

rodg45,

You are not reading what I write... I did mention that "Although they mention visible copper mineralization in the highlights section of the NR, they consistently refer to the visuals as being of copper sulphides in the detailed decription of the results of AT3."

I think its safe to assume they are talking about visible copper sulphide mineralization, and not visible copper, as the market would have reacted much more strongly to the news if it was the later. Perhaps this needs to be clarified with NOT.

At any rate, I am not saying there is anything bad about today's news - nowhere have I said that - but I am saying that I suspect that NOT wants to see more results for AT3 before it officially becomes another Eagle. No need to get all uptight about it... And if I am wrong, all the better.