Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Bentonstocks

Rank: President [?]

Points: 6383 [?]

Votes: 291 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles

in response to

Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles

Bentonstocks

posted on Apr 02, 2008 08:46AM

Just to add that any AT# could end-up being, say, DE4, depending on the order in which the targets (ATs) are drilled. There is no connection between the AT# and the DE#, as the the target sequencing (identified by geophysics) and deposit discovery sequencing (discovered by drilling) are entirely independent.