HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles--a question
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles
22
Bentonstocks
Apr 02, 2008 08:41AM
Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles
11
Bentonstocks
Apr 02, 2008 08:46AM
Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles--a question

jonboy
Apr 02, 2008 09:00AM
Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles/Benton
3
donypee
Apr 02, 2008 09:10AM
Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles/Benton
15
Bentonstocks
Apr 02, 2008 09:18AM

Same thing logically... The objective of drilling is to test for minerlization which is confirmed definitively by assays of selected segments of the drill core...

However, although you can assay your grab samples (pieces of rock/samples taken at surface by hand), you do not confirm the existence of mineral deposits this way...

Regards,

B.

Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles--a question

Posted by: jonboy on April 02, 2008 01:00PM

In response to: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles by Bentonstocks

"Confirmed by drilling" OR "Confirmed by assays"?

1 Recommendations
Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles/Benton--cool /em

jonboy
Apr 02, 2008 09:40AM
Re: Targets (ATs) vs. Eagles/Benton
10
donypee
Apr 02, 2008 10:12AM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply