Re: AT1 = DE1 are you sure?

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

Bentonstocks

Rank: President [?]

Points: 6383 [?]

Votes: 291 Score: 3.8 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: AT1 = DE1 are you sure?

in response to

AT1 = DE1 are you sure?

QQ_Girl

posted on Apr 02, 2008 08:31AM

QQ you are correct... AT1 is not DE1.

I have not looked at the grid to confirm the location, but I strongly suspect that the holes drilled on AT1 are the ones rumoured to be near FNC on the anomaly roughly 750 metres due south of DE1 . This is consistent with what Smith (FNC) mentioned to me a couple of days ago, i.e, that according to his conversation with Nemis, the holes did not intercept the source or cause of the anomaly, and he felt that they should have drilled deeper.