HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: McFaulds Lake area interest...Sag
8
Mar 27, 2008 05:21AM
6
Mar 27, 2008 05:39AM
12
Mar 27, 2008 06:37AM
Hey JD.....as usual, a thoughtful post.....yes DD for sure, you've done yours and one of them is SPQ(me too)......I'm curious about the 'motherload' issue which is brought up quite frequently. Is it possible that there was no 'motherload'?....ie...mineralization got emplaced in the crust slowly, from VERY deep....and there never was a singular 'motherload' but more of a long term 'seepage' before the conduits cooled? OR....is it also possible that the 'motherload' or bulk of the mineralization was eroded by repeated glacial epochs? ...TIA....sambone
11
pw
Mar 27, 2008 07:47AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply