HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: At what point does our...
18
Feb 18, 2008 05:00AM
5
Feb 18, 2008 05:12AM

I believe at this point that the 10% valuation is still the right number. However, once we cross the threshold that makes a mine viable, not only with our property but surrounding area, than, this valuation needs to increase.

My biggest issue with this valuation model is it does not properly assess the blue sky in our case. What is the probability of us finding more nickel? If you followed the Salami analogy by Prof Naldrett, who correctly predicted that the VB ovoid had more minerals in the surrounding area based on the high concentrations of Nickel in the ovoid, then you would think like me that the probability of finding more nickel in our case was quite high. The risk vs reward ratio here is very positive. Hence, the blue sky is seriously undervalued.

Glorieux

9
Feb 18, 2008 05:29AM
6
Feb 18, 2008 05:33AM
5
Feb 18, 2008 05:40AM
6
Feb 18, 2008 05:42AM
9
PM
Feb 18, 2008 05:43AM
1
Feb 18, 2008 05:46AM
6
Feb 18, 2008 05:58AM
5
Feb 18, 2008 06:19AM
6
Feb 18, 2008 08:22AM

Feb 18, 2008 08:42AM
1
Feb 18, 2008 08:58AM

Feb 18, 2008 09:04AM
18
PM
Feb 18, 2008 09:16AM
17
Feb 18, 2008 09:46AM
4
PM
Feb 18, 2008 10:10AM
2
Feb 18, 2008 10:58AM

PM
Feb 18, 2008 02:20PM
7
Feb 18, 2008 07:32PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply