HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Re: My Windfall Lake Valuation
39
pw
Dec 08, 2007 04:24PM
2
PM
Dec 08, 2007 09:31PM
1
PM
Dec 08, 2007 09:37PM
4
pw
Dec 09, 2007 08:22AM
1
PM
Dec 09, 2007 08:25AM

HSS
Dec 09, 2007 08:32AM

Dec 09, 2007 09:01AM

pw
Dec 09, 2007 09:33AM

pw
Dec 09, 2007 09:44AM

pw
Dec 09, 2007 09:57AM
3
Dec 09, 2007 04:23PM
1
Dec 09, 2007 04:39PM
10
pw
Dec 09, 2007 06:28PM
23
Dec 09, 2007 06:36PM
8
pw
Dec 09, 2007 07:52PM

Thanx pw and enginerd for your valuations.

I found a few more details which I want to share.

First, in wikipedia I found the s.g. of felsic rock, which is a mixture of FELdspar and SIliCa. Feldspar has 2.5, silica has 2.65 (unfortunately they German wikipedia says amorphous silica has 2.2). So if we assume 2.5, we are on the conservative side.

Then I was confused on the factors between grams and ounces. The factor 34.2 applied by pw may be the factor of 31.1 grams per troy ounce, combined with a recovery factor. Using a higher factor takes into account that the gold recovery is not 100% but perhaps 90 %. Is that a good guess?

drĀ 

2
pw
Dec 10, 2007 06:20PM
1
Dec 10, 2007 07:20PM
8
pw
Dec 11, 2007 06:39AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply