I, like others, prefer to be conservative in response to the comments forwarded from the meeting and elsewhere.  It is my understanding that announcements/information that could affect the SP of a company must be issued in the appropriate public manner.  Anything else would be in contradiction to what I believe to be RNs tenets.  In addition, statements like " looks like hole #5" could be largely open to interpretation without lab substantiation.  There have been numerous predictions over the past days that have most certainly not met their deadlines or for that matter proven their content.  As has been earlier noted, the time to get excited is after legal dissemination of factual information.  

Having said the above, If the sources of these predictions are accurate but for the timing, then timing is ultimately irrelevant.  I would be most happy to see these rumours/reports vindicated, hopefully without any trust violations involved, as it is my belief that we are well capable of the kind of results submitted to be coming.  I would look forward to a halt tomorrow based on the alleged news!  Concerning the report from Snug, I believe him to be a person of integrity.