HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Honestly, I feel a little silly...

Honestly, I feel a little silly...

posted on Oct 24, 2007 01:30PM

Making you guys guess... I wish you all had Kaiser subscriptions.

This is something new (in terms of our collective knowledge, I believe), and not does not involve descriptions using the anatomy of sea creatures...

However, it does shed light on why RN has been apt to make such statements as "this could be bigger than Voisey's Bay."

Anyway, its still not a sure thing by any stretch, but now that I know this, I assign a much higher probability to NOT discovering a deposit much bigger than the current estimates ranging from 1 to 5 million tonnes.

Again, not trying to be silly here, but I do want to tread carefully with what I divulge about what Kaiser has published....

Certainly some other big mouth will spill it, maybe on Shouse, so you may find out regardless of me being mum.

Regards,

B.

 

 

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply