Re: RING of Fire, not "Boomerang"

HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Reply New Message

Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message

selocj

Rank: Treasurer [?]

Points: 727 [?]

Votes: 54 Score: 3.4 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Re: RING of Fire, not "Boomerang"

in response to

RING of Fire, not "Boomerang"

imaviking

posted on Sep 28, 2007 05:11AM

In one of RN presentations he mention that it appeared that it might be a large basin, I think it was in the presentations to the brokers. I thought that he mentioned a diameter, but I can't remember what it was so I won't try and quote.