HIGH-GRADE NI-CU-PT-PD-ZN-CR-AU-V-TI DISCOVERIES IN THE "RING OF FIRE"

NI 43-101 Update (September 2012): 11.1 Mt @ 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89 gpt Pt and 3.09 gpt Pd and 0.18 gpt Au (Proven & Probable Reserves) / 8.9 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inferred Resource)

Free
Message: Question: Of Drill Holes and Poker...ahhhh maybe Gin Rummy
1
Sep 27, 2007 06:27AM
9
Sep 27, 2007 06:30AM
1
Sep 27, 2007 06:33AM

Sep 27, 2007 06:33AM
1
Sep 27, 2007 06:47AM
2
Sep 27, 2007 06:51AM
2
Sep 27, 2007 06:57AM

Sep 27, 2007 07:00AM

Hi all:

 Still reading more than posting but wondering now about the timing of NR'S/core results....

Here's my question(s) to the learned posters (you know who you are):

1. When great core samples come out of the ground, like #5,  there is a good indication just from visual inspection that it's gonna be good, right?  This was evidenced in the RN video conf and sometimes the assay results only confirm and quantify, in precise terms, what is already known.

2.  If other core samples (like 7, for example) are of the same "ilk" wouldn't RN have the opportunity to release results in a certain order so that the SP is maximized for the shareholders in the long run? 

I hope these questions make sense.  If not, I apologize.

GLTA

 

CH

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply