Next Monday I will be seated at Lawrence Roulston's "subscribers only" Resource Opportunities conference at the New York Hard Assests Conference.
For a while now, I've had this fantasy about confronting Mr. Roulston with the following:
"Mr. Roulston, It wasn't too long ago that you rated Niogold with the high rank of "2a" and, accompanied that rating with a comprehensive description of the reasons supporting that ranking.
Yet, with little or no explanation, you suddenly devalued Niogolds rank from one of your highest to your lowest, a "2c".
Don't you think you owe your subscribers, Niogold and especially those who invested in Niogold because of your recommendation, a more responsible and less damaging way in which you lower your ratings?"
What do you think? Should I live out my fantasy?
Baires