MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
posted on
Aug 11, 2010 07:55AM
New Vision - New World - New Resources
1 NAUTILUS MINERALS INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (US dollars, in accordance with Canadian GAAP) The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) has been prepared as at August 10, 2010 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. It includes references to United States dollars, Canadian dollars, Papua New Guinea Kina, United Kingdom pounds Sterling and Euros. All dollar amounts referenced, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in United States dollars and the Canadian dollars are referred to as C$, Papua New Guinea Kina are referred to as PGK, United Kingdom pounds Sterling are referred to as £ and Euros are referred to as €. The MD&A of Nautilus Minerals Inc. (the “Company”, “NMI” or “Nautilus”) should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. This section contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to those described under “Forward-Looking Information.” FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION This MD&A contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of its management as well as assumptions made by management and information currently available to the Company. When used in this document, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, regulatory compliance, the sufficiency of current working capital, the estimated cost and availability of funding for the continued exploration of the Company’s exploration properties. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could cause the actual results, performance or achievement of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. OUR BUSINESS Overview Nautilus is the first company to commercially explore the ocean floor for copper, gold, silver and zinc seafloor massive sulphide (“SMS”) deposits, and is well positioned to develop the world’s first seafloor massive sulphide system. The Company’s main focus for 2010 is the Solwara 1 Project which is located in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea (“PNG”) in the western Pacific Ocean. The proposed operations of the Company, subject to permitting and financing, will be the exploration for and the mining of SMS deposits for copper, zinc, gold and silver where there are economically viable discoveries. FIRST QUARTER 2009 HIGHLIGHTS •
$184.7 million (equivalent) in cash and cash equivalents held on deposit with major
banks as at June 30, 2010
•
Contract signed for 2010 drilling program
•
Offshore Production System Definition and Cost Study Released
•
Nautilus strengthens Board with New Director
2
$184.7 Million (equivalent) in Cash and Cash Equivalents Held on Deposit with Major
Banks
Nautilus is in a strong financial position with $184.7 million (equivalent) in cash and cash
equivalents held on deposit with banks holding an S&P rating of A+ or better, as at June 30,
2010.
Contract Signed for 2010 Drilling Program
On June 10, 2010 Nautilus signed a contract with the TSMarine Group of Companies
("TSMarine") under which TSMarine agreed to provide drilling services in the territorial waters of
Papua New Guinea starting in October 2010. The drilling program will focus on improving the
resource and geotechnical understanding at Solwara 1 as well as scout drilling at other prospects
on the Company's 100% owned tenements in the Bismarck Sea.
TSMarine will provide the vessel, operating crew, remotely operated vehicles and drilling
equipment. The contract has a minimum value of approximately US$7.5 million, with options to
extend based on success. TSMarine will use Rovdrill 3, a second generation seafloor drilling
system, with the ability to drill 70mm core wireline holes up to 80 metres deep.
Offshore Production System Definition and Cost Study
On June 23, 2010 Nautilus released the results of an independent definition and cost study (the
"Study") for its proposed offshore production system (the "Offshore Production System") to be
deployed in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea ("PNG").
The Study provides definition and cost estimates to extract material from the seafloor mineral
resources at the Company's Solwara 1 site (the "Project"), to raise it to the support vessel,
dewater it and deliver it to the Port of Rabaul, PNG.
The key conclusions of the Study are as follows:
•
Capital costs for the Offshore Production System, including those associated with barging
to the Port of Rabaul, are estimated to be US$383 million (including a 17.5% contingency).
•
Average operating costs up to the Port of Rabaul are estimated to be US$70 per tonne
(including a 10% contingency) based on a 1.35 million tonnes per year production rate.
•
The Study indicates production commencing at a rate of 1.2 million tonnes per year (dry
equivalent) but notes that the Offshore Production System will have the capacity to ramp up to 1.8 million tonnes per year.
•
The Study estimates it will take 30 months to complete the build of the Offshore
Production System and to commence commercial production once approved by the Board of Nautilus. To date, the complete build of the Offshore Production System has not been approved by the Board of Nautilus. Subject to securing adequate financing to advance the Project through to commercial production, Board approval is expected to be received during 2010. Nautilus does not intend to complete a formal feasibility study or define a large, long life resource or reserve before
3
it proceeds with the completion of the equipment build and commencement of production at the
Solwara 1 Project. Management considers the Company's best interests are served by first
demonstrating that existing offshore technologies can be adapted to cut and recover high grade
seafloor massive sulphides from the deep ocean.
The Study
The Study was undertaken to obtain an independently confirmed summary of the components
and an associated estimate of the offshore production costs only. Detailed information concerning
the cost estimates and the basis for the estimates can be found in the Study.
The estimated operating costs set out in the Study do not include the cost of stockpiling material
in Rabaul, reclaim from the stockpile, shipment to a treatment facility or any other downstream
processing, transportation and sales costs including, but not limited to concentration, treatment
and refining charges, cost of sales and any statutory royalties or production taxes. These costs
are significant. The estimated operating costs also exclude the capital and financing costs
associated with establishing the Offshore Production System.
In preparing the operating cost estimate, a heavy fuel oil price of US$523 per tonne and a
production support vessel charter rate of US$75,000 per day (being a portion of the estimated
daily costs of US$144,796 for the production support vessel) were assumed based on recent
competitive market quotes. These two key assumptions account for approximately 40% of the
estimated operating costs. Fuel costs will be subject to fluctuations in the market price of oil. The
Study assumes that the production support vessel for the Project will be chartered. As Nautilus
has not yet entered into a charter for the vessel, the price used in the estimate may not be
realized.
Investors are cautioned that the Study is not an economic assessment of the Solwara 1 Project
as a whole and does not confirm the Project's economic viability. Investors are cautioned not to
use the Study for that purpose and that a study of all costs, rates of recovery and reasonable
revenue projections is necessary before any assessment of economic viability can be made.
The Study was developed from a preliminary mine plan that includes inferred mineral resources.
Investors are cautioned that inferred resources are considered too speculative geologically to
have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as
mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the costs relating to the Offshore Production
System set forth in the Study will be realized. In addition, the indicated mineral resources
included in the mine plan are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
The Study addresses the entire proposed Offshore Production System, including barging to a
land-based stockpile at Rabaul in Papua New Guinea. The principal operations involve:
•
Seafloor cutting and gathering;
•
Mineralized material (slurry) recovery to surface;
•
Slurry dewatering;
•
Mineralized material discharge to transportation barges; and
•
Transport of the mineralized material to the Port of Rabaul.
The proposed Offshore Production System is composed of various technologies utilised in the oil and gas, mining and dredging industries but modified for the Offshore Production System. Seafloor cutting is proposed to be undertaken by two large robotic machines that would excavate material from the seafloor by a continuous cutting process, not unlike coal or other bulk continuous mining machines on land. The Auxiliary Miner is a preparatory machine that deals
4
with rough terrain and creates benches for the other machines to work. It will operate on tracks
with spud assistance and has a boom mounted cutting head for flexibility. The second machine,
the Bulk Miner, has higher cutting capacity but will be limited to working benches created by the
Auxiliary Miner. Both machines would leave cut material on the seafloor for collection by the
Gathering Machine. The Gathering Machine, also a large robotic vehicle, will collect the cut
material by drawing it in as a seawater slurry through internal pumps. The slurry will exit the
Gathering Machine through a flexible pipe and would then be transferred to the Riser and Lift
System (RALS).
The proposed RALS system comprises a large pump and rigid riser pipe hanging from a vessel
which delivers the slurry to the surface. The proposed pump is a positive displacement type,
designed and built by GE Hydril (Houston, TX). The pump would hang from a solid vertical riser
pipe suspended beneath the support vessel. The pipe would be deployed to the seabed by a
large derrick and draw works system on board the vessel.
On deck of the production support vessel (PSV), the slurry would pass through a dewatering
plant. The dewatered material would be discharged to a transportation barge moored alongside.
Used seawater would be pumped back to the seafloor through the riser pipes and would provide
the hydraulic power to operate the RALS pump. Discharge of the return water at the seafloor
would avoid impacts to the warm surface seawaters, minimizing the environmental impact of the
operation.
The transportation barges will haul the material a short voyage of approximately 50 kms from the
Solwara 1 site to a stockpile location in the Port of Rabaul. Definition and costs for barge
unloading and all subsequent activities are not included in the scope of the Study.
The Study, which is titled "Offshore Production System Definition and Cost Study" and dated
June 21, 2010, was prepared by Phil Jankowski, Erich Heymann and John Blackburn of SRK
(Australia) Pty Ltd. in Perth and includes information prepared by Peter Chwastiak of Clough
Limited, Peter Munro of Mineralurgy Pty Ltd, Andrew See of Ausenco Services Pty. Ltd and Ian
Lipton of Golder Associates Pty. Ltd (collectively, the "Qualified Persons").
Issue of Variation Order
The Offshore Production System described in the Study requires the build of three subsea
deepwater machines for cutting and gathering, being the Auxiliary Miner, Bulk Miner and
Gathering Machine.
Nautilus also finalised and issued a variation order to Soil Machine Dynamics Ltd ("SMD") to
modify the existing design-build contract for the provision of two integrated machines and one
handling system to three specialist machines and the associated launch and recovery systems.
The variation order, valued at approximately £19 million (US$28 million or C$29 million
equivalent)
(1)
has been incorporated in the Study. It should be noted that no approval has been
granted by the Nautilus Board for the recommencement of the building of any other equipment for the Offshore Production System.
(1)
Exchange rates used: C$1.00 equal to US$0.97 and £0.66.
Nautilus Strengthens Board with New Director
At the Company’s AGM on June 23, 2010, Ms Cynthia Patricia Thomas (age 49) was appointed
to the Nautilus Board.
5
Cynthia Thomas has 28 years of banking and mine finance experience, and currently acts as
Principal of Conseil Advisory Services Inc. ("Conseil"), an independent financial advisory firm
specialising in the natural resource industry which she founded in 2000. Prior to founding Conseil,
Ms. Thomas worked with Bank of Montreal, Scotiabank and ScotiaMcLeod in the corporate and
investment banking divisions. Ms. Thomas holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the
University of Toronto and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Western
Ontario. Ms. Thomas was formerly a Director of PolyMet Mining Corp. and is currently a Director
and Chair of Victory Nickel Inc., Director of KWG Resources Inc. and a Director and Chair of the
Audit Committee for Ferrinov Inc., a private corporation.
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS (unaudited)
The following table sets out selected unaudited quarterly financial information of Nautilus and is
derived from unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements prepared by management.
The Company’s interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and expressed in US dollars.
Period
Revenues
(in millions)
Income (Loss) and
Comprehensive Income
(Loss) for the Period
(in millions)
Basic Income
(Loss) per
Share
Diluted Income
(Loss) per Share
2
nd
Quarter 2010 Nil $(11.7) $(0.08) $(0.08)
1
st
Quarter 2010 Nil $(8.0) $(0.05) $(0.05)
4
th
Quarter 2009 Nil $(14.4) $(0.09) $(0.09)
3
rd
Quarter 2009 Nil $(7.4) $(0.05) $(0.05)
2
nd
Quarter 2009 Nil $2.7 $0.02 $0.02
1
st
Quarter 2009 Nil $(8.0) $(0.05) $(0.05)
4
th
Quarter 2008 Nil $(35.2) $(0.24) $(0.24)
3
rd
Quarter 2008 Nil $(38.4) $(0.26) $(0.26)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides an analysis of the financial results of Nautilus:
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
Income for the period
Net income
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss of $19.7 million ($0.13
loss per share) compared to a loss of $5.4 million ($0.03 loss per share) for the same period in
2009. The increase in loss is attributable to an unrealised foreign exchange loss of $5.2 million
compared to an unrealised foreign exchange gain of $5.3 million for the same period in 2009.
Exploration expense
Exploration expense increased to $7.7 million (2009 - $5.9 million) due to an increase in the
number of exploration personnel compared to the same period in 2009.
Interest income
Interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents held during the period was $0.8 million
(2009 - $1.2 million). The decrease was attributable to the decrease in cash held during the
6
period. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with banks with an S&P rating of
A+ or better.
Non-cash stock based compensation
A total of $2.1 million in non-cash stock based compensation was expensed during the period
(2009 - $2.0 million). The increase is attributable to the increase in the number of options
outstanding over the period.
Foreign exchange gains and losses
A foreign exchange loss of $5.2 million was recorded during the period (2009 – gain of $5.4
million). The foreign exchange loss consists of realised and unrealised gains and losses on
actual cash transactions during the period and revaluations of cash denominated in different
currencies at the period end.
Depreciation expense
Depreciation expense decreased slightly to $0.4 million (2009 - $0.5 million).
Other general and administrative costs
There has been an overall increase in other general and administrative expenses compared to
the same period in 2009 as the Company focuses its attention on securing a strategic partner,
continuing engineering studies and planning for the exploration program scheduled for later in the
year.
Other general and administrative expenses consist of:
•
management fees and salaries of $0.9 million (2009 - $0.9 million;
•
wages and salaries of $1.9 million (2009 - $1.4 million), an increase of $0.5 million due to
an increase in the number of employees and general increase in salaries in keeping with market rates;
•
office expenses increased to $1.2 million (2009 - $0.8 million), an increase of $0.4 million
in keeping with the increase in personnel;
•
travel expenses of $0.3 million (2009 - $0.2 million), an increase of $0.1 million over the
period due to the timing of business travel taken during the quarter;
•
professional fees of $0.6 million (2009 - $0.3 million), an increase of $0.3 million over the
period due to the timing of professional services provided; and
•
shareholder information, listing and filing fees of $0.3 million (2009 – $0.2 million).
Overall, Nautilus’ expenses increased to $20.5 million for the period ended June 30, 2010, up from $6.7 million for the same period in 2009 due to an increase in foreign exchange losses of $10.6 million and an increase in exploration costs, salaries and wages. Engineering work directly related to the purchase of equipment has been included as assets under construction and is detailed below under Investing activities.
Cash flows
Operating activities
Cash used in operating activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $16.0 million
as compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $12.1 million for the period ended June
30, 2009. The increase in cash used in operating activities is attributable to the higher
exploration costs and salaries and wages during the period.
7
Investing activities
Cash used in investing activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $3.5 million
as compared to $0.8 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2009. This related to the
purchase of equipment.
Financing activities
Cash from financing activities for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009
was $Nil respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010
Income for the period
Net income
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a loss of $11.7 million ($0.08
loss per share) compared to a profit of $2.7 million ($0.02 gain per share) for the same period in
2009. The increase in loss is attributable to an unrealised foreign exchange loss of $2.8 million
compared to an unrealised foreign exchange gain of $9.5 million for the same period in 2009.
Exploration expense
Exploration expense increased to $5.6 million (2009 - $4.3 million) due to an increase in the
number of exploration personnel compared to the same period in 2009.
Interest income
Interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents held during the period was $0.3 million
(2009 - $0.7 million). The decrease was attributable to the decrease in cash held during the
period. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with banks with an S&P rating of
A+ or better.
Non-cash stock based compensation
A total of $1.0 million in non-cash stock based compensation was expensed during the period
(2009 - $1.0 million).
Foreign exchange gains and losses
A foreign exchange loss of $2.8 million was recorded during the period (2009 – gain of $9.5
million). The foreign exchange loss consists of realised and unrealised gains and losses on
actual cash transactions during the period and revaluations of cash denominated in different
currencies at the period end.
Depreciation expense
Depreciation expense remained unchanged at $0.2 million (2009 - $0.2 million).
Other general and administrative costs
There has been an overall increase in other general and administrative expenses compared to
the same period in 2009 as the Company focuses its attention on securing a strategic partner,
continuing engineering studies and planning for the exploration program scheduled for later in the
year.
Other general and administrative expenses consist of:
•
management fees and salaries of $0.4 million (2009 - $0.6 million);
•
wages and salaries of $0.7 million (2009 - $0.6 million), an increase of $0.1 million due to
an increase in the number of employees and general increase in salaries in keeping with market rates;
8
•
office expenses increased to $0.7 million (2009 - $0.5 million), an increase of $0.2 million
in keeping with the increase in personnel;
•
travel expenses of $0.2 million (2009 - $0.1 million), an increase of $0.1 million over the
period due to the timing of business travel taken during the quarter;
•
professional fees of $0.4 million (2009 - $0.2 million), an increase of $0.2 million over the
period due to the timing of professional services provided; and
•
shareholder information, listing and filing fees of $0.1 million (2009 – $0.1 million).
Overall, Nautilus’ expenses increased to $12.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, up from a profit of $2.0 million for the same period in 2009 due to an increase in foreign exchange losses of $12.3 million and an increase in exploration costs and salary and wages. Engineering work directly related to the purchase of equipment has been included as assets under construction and is detailed below under Investing activities.
Cash flows
Operating activities
Cash used in operating activities for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was $5.6
million as compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $1.0 million for the three month
period ended June 30, 2009. The increase in cash used in operating activities is attributable to
the higher exploration costs and salaries and wages during the period.
Investing activities
Cash used in investing activities for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was $2.9 million
as compared to $0.3 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. This related to the
purchase of equipment.
Financing activities
Cash from financing activities for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009
was $Nil respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s financial objective is to ensure that it has sufficient liquidity in the form of cash
and/or debt capacity to finance its ongoing requirements to support the Company’s strategy of
becoming the first company to commercially extract copper, gold, silver and zinc from the
seafloor.
Key financial measures
The Company uses the following key financial measures to assess its financial condition and
liquidity:
June 30
2010
December 31
2009
Debt to Equity Nil Nil
Current Ratio 58.2 to 1 25.9 to 1
Working Capital $181.8 million $201.2 million
Cash and Cash Equivalents $184.7 million $209.3 million
Under the Company’s Investment Policy, cash cannot be invested for more than 90 days and
must be held on deposit with banks with an S&P credit rating of A+ or better.
9
Outlook and capital requirements
The Company’s known contractual obligations at June 30, 2010, are quantified in the table below:
June 30
2010
$
Non-cancellable operating leases
Not later than 1 year 669,338
Later than 1 year and not later than 2 years 636,807
Later than 2 years and not later than 3 years 553,876
Later than 3 years and not later than 4 years 540,826
Later than 4 years and not later than 5 years 540,826
2,941,673
Non-cancellable exploration and vessel agreements
Not later than 1 year 7,515,800
7,515,800
Non-cancellable development agreements
Not later than 1 year 768,621
768,621
Total Commitments 11,226,099
The Company is involved in mineral exploration which is a high risk activity and relies on results
from each exploration program to determine if areas justify any further exploration and the extent
and method of appropriate exploration to be conducted.
The Company has budgeted to spend approximately $30 million for exploration work in 2010 on
the Solwara 1 Project and other regional exploration programs. If exploration results and
engineering studies are positive, the Company may consider committing additional funds to
finance further engineering and exploration studies. In addition, the Company may consider
further increases in staffing levels.
In order to maintain the exploration leases, licenses and permits in which the Company is
involved, the Company is expected to fulfill the minimum annual expenditure conditions under
which the tenements are granted. These obligations may be varied from time to time, subject to
approval, and are expected to be fulfilled in the normal course of operations of the Company.
The exploration commitments are based on those exploration tenements that have been granted
and may increase or decrease depending on whether additional applications are granted,
relinquished or whether the Company forms joint ventures in the future.
The Company has reactivated the contract with Soil Machine Dynamics (“SMD”) of Newcastle
upon Tyne, UK for the design and build of the seafloor mining tools. The remaining value of the
contract is US$75.6 million (equivalent). The contract with SMD is cancellable by the Company
at any time, however, in the event of cancellation, the Company would be liable for any costs
incurred by SMD up to that point in time. No other penalties or cancellation fees are payable
under this contract.
During the quarter, the Company entered into an EPCM contract with Technip Oceania Pty Ltd
(“Technip”) for engineering design, procurement and construction management for the integration
of the subea mining equipment onto a production support vessel. The current authorized value of
the contract is US$1.3 million. The contract with Technip is cancellable by the Company at any
time, however, in the event of cancellation, the Company would be liable for any costs incurred by
10
Technip up to that point in time. No other penalties or cancellation fees are payable under this
contract.
All other contracts relating to the Solwara 1 mining system have been suspended without penalty.
The contracts that have been suspended will not incur any additional costs, unless instructed by
the Company to continue with engineering studies, until those contracts are reactivated. The
remaining value of the suspended contracts is US$55.4 million. The suspended contracts also
contain provisions allowing the Company to cancel at any time.
The Company will need to obtain significant additional capital to develop any of its exploration
properties, including Solwara 1, and debt financing may not be obtainable for a project such as
that contemplated. The Company may need to rely on the equity markets for future financing of
the Company's development of Solwara 1 in the form of joint ventures, leasing options and
offtake agreements which may not be obtainable for the project as contemplated.
Nautilus expects that the cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to pay for the continued
budgeted exploration, capital expenditure and general and administrative costs of the Solwara 1
Project and other Company expenditures for the next 12 months. Depending upon future events,
the rate of expenditures and other general and administrative costs could increase or decrease.
Other than as disclosed above, the Company has not formally sought to secure sources of
additional financing to fund future expenditures.
Nautilus’ opinion concerning liquidity and its ability to avail itself in the future of the financing
options mentioned in the above forward-looking statements are based on currently available
information. To the extent that this information proves to be inaccurate, future availability of
financing may be adversely affected. Factors that could affect the availability of financing include
Nautilus’ performance (as measured by various factors including the progress and results of its
exploration work), the state of international debt and equity markets, investor perceptions and
expectations of past and future performance, the global financial climate, metal and commodity
prices, political events in the south Pacific, obtaining approvals from the PNG government for the
Solwara 1 Project, drilling and metallurgical testing results, results from environmental studies,
engineering studies and detailed design of equipment.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
The Company’s operations are located in several different countries, including Canada, Australia,
PNG, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Fiji and New Zealand and require equipment to be purchased
from several different countries. Nautilus has entered into key contracts in United States dollars,
British Pounds sterling and Euros. Future profitability could be affected by fluctuations in foreign
currencies. The Company has not entered into any foreign currency contracts or other derivatives
to establish a foreign currency protection program but may consider such actions in the future.
Foreign exchange risk is mitigated by the Company maintaining its cash in a “basket” of
currencies that reflect its current and expected cash outflows. As at June 30, 2010 the Company
held its cash in the following currencies:
Currency
Denomination
% of total cash in
US$ terms held
USD 62
GBP 21
AUD 6
EUR 8
CAD 3
100
11
Interest rate risk
The Company holds cash and cash equivalents which earn interest at variable rates as
determined by financial institutions.
For the period ending June 30, 2010, with other variables unchanged, a 1% increase (decrease)
in the interest rate would have increased (decreased) our net earnings by approximately
$981,193. There would be no significant effect on other comprehensive income.
Credit risk
The Company places its cash only with banks with an S&P credit rating of A+ or better.
Our maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of cash and cash
equivalents and other receivables.
Liquidity risk
The Company manages liquidity by maintaining adequate cash and short-term investment
balances.
In addition, the Company regularly monitors and reviews both actual and forecasted cash flows.
The exposure of the Company to liquidity risk is considered to be minimal.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The details of the Company’s accounting policies are presented in Note 2 of the audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. The following policies
are considered by management to be essential to understanding the processes and reasoning
that go into the preparation of the Company’s financial statements and the uncertainties that
could have a bearing on its financial results:
Resource properties
Acquisition and exploration costs are expensed as incurred since the Company is in the process
of exploring its mineral tenements and has not yet determined whether these properties contain
ore reserves that are economically recoverable. If and when the Company’s management
determines that economically extractable resource have been established, the subsequent costs
incurred to develop such property, including costs to further delineate the ore body will be
capitalised.
Future Accounting Pronouncements
Sections 1582, Business Combinations, 1601 Consolidated Financial Statements and 1602
Non-controlling interests
Sections 1582, Business Combinations, 1601 Consolidated Financial Statements and 1602 Noncontrolling
interests will replace the former Sections 1581 Business Combinations, 1600
Consolidated Financial Statements and establish a new section for accounting for a noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary. Section 1582 is effective for business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2011 and Sections 1601 and 1602 apply to
consolidated financial statements relating to years beginning on or after January 1, 2011.
12
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
In January 2006, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) adopted a strategic plan for
the direction of accounting standards in Canada. In February 2008, as part of its strategic plan,
AcSB confirmed that Canadian publicly accountable entities will be required to report under
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), which will replace Canadian GAAP for
years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. Financial reporting under IFRS differs from
Canadian GAAP in a number of respects, some of which are significant. IFRS on the date of
adoption is also expected to differ from current IFRS due to new IFRS standards and
pronouncements that are expected to be issued before the changeover date. We plan to prepare
our financial statements in accordance with IFRS for periods commencing as of January 1, 2011.
The following information is presented pursuant to the October 2008 recommendations of the
Canadian Performance Reporting Board relating to pre-2011 communications about IFRS
conversion and to comply with Canadian Securities Administrators Staff Notice 52-320,
Disclosure of Expected Changes in Accounting Policies Relating to Changeover to International
Financial Reporting Standards. This information is provided to allow investors and others to
obtain a better understanding of our IFRS changeover plan and the resulting possible effect on
our financial statements. Readers are cautioned, however, that it may not be appropriate to use
such information for any other purposes. This information also reflects the Company’s most
recent assumptions and expectations; circumstances may arise, such as changes in IFRS,
regulations or economic conditions, which could change these assumptions or expectations.
IFRS Changeover Plan
The Company has developed a plan for its changeover to IFRS comprised of three related
phases:
•
Review and Assessment
•
Design
•
Implementation
Phase 1: Review and Assessment Phase
The objective of this phase is to identify the required changes to the Company’s accounting
policies and practices resulting from the changeover to IFRS to determine the scope of the work
effort required for the Design and Implementation phases.
Phase 1 involves:
•
A detailed review of all relevant IFRS standards to identify differences with the Company’s
current accounting policies and practices
•
The separate consideration of one-time accounting policy alternatives that must be
addressed at the changeover date, and those accounting policy choices that will be applied on an ongoing basis in periods subsequent to the changeover to IFRS
•
The prioritization of those differences that could have a more than inconsequential impact on
the Company’s financial statements, business processes or IT systems
•
The identification of internal stakeholders and business areas that may be affected by the
changeover.
Phase 2: Design Phase
Phase 2 will result in the design and development of detailed solutions to address the differences
identified in the first phase of the Company’s changeover plan. These solutions will result in
certain necessary changes to the Company’s internal business processes and financial systems
to comply with IFRS accounting and disclosure requirements.
13
Phase 2 activities include:
•
The evaluation of accounting policy alternatives
•
The investigation, development and documentation of solutions to resolve differences
identified in Phase 1, reflecting changes to existing accounting policies and practices, business processes, IT systems and internal controls
•
The implementation of a change management strategy to address the information and
training needs of internal and external stakeholders
Phase 3: Implementation Phase
In the third and final phase of its changeover plan the Company will finalise the quantification of
any differences identified on transition to IFRS. To date the Company has not identified any
significant financial adjustments required on transition.
In addition, the Company will implement the changes to affected accounting policies and
practices, business processes, systems and internal controls. These changes will be tested prior
to the formal reporting requirements under IFRS to ensure all significant differences are
appropriately addressed in time for the changeover.
Progress towards Completion of the Company’s IFRS Changeover Plan
Nautilus expects to adopt IFRS effective January 1, 2011. In 2011, the Company will present
2010 comparative figures restated using IFRS for each comparative period after the transition
date.
Nautilus has completed Phase 1 and 2 and is currently completing Phase 3 of its changeover
plan.
For all changes to policies and procedures that are identified, the effectiveness of internal
controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures will also be assessed
and any changes implemented. In addition, controls over the IFRS changeover process will be
implemented as necessary. The Company does not expect these changes to be significant.
The Company is continuing to assess the impact of the IFRS transition on its information
systems; however does not anticipate significant changes to its systems arising from the
transition to IFRS.
At the end of 2010, the Company will prepare two sets of financial statements. One set will
comply with Canadian GAAP for reporting purposes. The other set will comply with IFRS for use
as comparative figures once Nautilus adopts IFRS on January 1, 2011.
Key Differences
Nautilus has performed its review of IFRS based on standards applicable as of the date of this
report. The ISAB is still developing IFRS and may propose changes to the standards between
the date of this report and the date the Company adopts IFRS. Nautilus’ assessment of
differences between Canadian GAAP and IFRS are based on its historical, current and expected
business activities. Changes in business activities could also lead to unexpected differences to
the Company’s financial statements, notes and other disclosures as reported under Canadian
GAAP and IFRS. Changes to business activities or transactions and/or IFRS could have material
effects on Nautilus’ assessment below. Nautilus will track the difference between Canadian
GAAP and IFRS on individual transactions throughout 2010. It will also analyse the effect of
changes in IFRS as they occur. Nautilus will continue to provide quarterly and annual updates on
the IFRS Changeover Plan in future filings throughout the transition period to 2011.
14
The Company has identified key areas where changes in accounting policy are expected on its
transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS and these are identified below. This list is intended to
highlight the areas that the Company has determined to be the most significant and should not be
regarded as a complete list of changes that will result from the transition to IFRS.
First-time adoption of IFRS
IFRS 1, “First time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards”, generally requires
that all IFRS standards and interpretations be accounted for on a retrospective basis. IFRS 1
provides for certain optional exemptions and other mandatory exceptions to this general principal.
The most significant IFRS optional exemption which the Company expects to apply is:
Exemption Summary of exemption and decision
IFRS 3, Business Combinations Allows an entity that has conducted prior
business combinations to apply IFRS 3 on a
prospective basis from the date of transition.
This avoids the requirement to restate prior
business combinations.
Nautilus believes that the Reverse Takeover on
May 8 2006 would qualify as a business
combination and therefore has elected to apply
this exemption.
Functional Currency
IFRS requires the functional currency to be assessed independently for each subsidiary within a
consolidated group and introduces the concept of primary and secondary factors. Nautilus
determined the U.S. dollar to be the functional currency for Canadian GAAP effective January 1,
2008 and expects the functional currency to remain unchanged under IFRS.
Income Taxes
There remains uncertainty around accounting for income taxes under IFRS. The IASB has
recently issued an exposure draft suggesting changes to its income tax standard. The exposure
draft has received a significant number of comments and it is uncertain what changes, if any, will
be made before Nautilus’ adoption date of January 1, 2011.
Asset Impairment
Canadian GAAP provides a two-step approach to testing a long-lived asset for impairment in the
event that indicators exist. The first step is a test for recoverability whereby the carrying value is
compared to the undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If the
undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying amount, then no impairment charge is necessary. If
the undiscounted cash flows are lower than the carrying amount of the asset, then the asset is
written down to the estimated fair value, determined based on the discounted cash flows.
Under IFRS, an entity is required to assess whether there is an indication of impairment at each
reporting date. If such an indication exists, the entity must compare the carrying value of the
asset or cash generating unit (“CGU”) to the recoverable amount. Recoverable amount is defined
as the higher of an asset or CGU’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Value in use
is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset or CGU. An
impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the recoverable
amount. Unlike Canadian GAAP, IFRS requires impairment charges to be reversed if the
circumstances leading to the impairment no longer exist.
15
This change may result in impairment losses being recognized earlier under IFRS that would not
be recognized under Canadian GAAP.
Nautilus does not expect an impairment loss to be recognized on transition to IFRS.
Provision for reclamation and rehabilitation
The primary differences between IFRS and Canadian GAAP for reclamation and rehabilitation
provisions include the basis of estimation for undiscounted cash flows, the discount rate used, the
frequency of liability re-measurement, and recognition of a liability when a constructive obligation
exists.
Canadian GAAP requires the estimate of undiscounted cash flows to be based on the amount
that a third party would demand to assume the obligation, whereas IFRS focuses on the use of
management’s best estimate of the expenditures required to settle the obligation.
The discount rate used to determine the present value of the expenditures for Canadian GAAP is
the credit-adjusted risk free rate for the entity. IFRS requires the use of a discount rate that
reflects the risks specific to the liability.
IFRS requires the re-measurement of the liability at each reporting date. The recognition
principle is broadened with the implementation of IFRS, which requires that a liability be recorded
if there is a legal or constructive obligation, where Canadian GAAP requires a liability to be
recognized when there is a legal obligation.
The Company does not anticipate any impact from the provision for reclamation and rehabilitation
on its consolidated financial statements on transition to IFRS.
Exploration & Evaluation (“E&E”) Costs
The International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) has still not made a definitive
determination as to whether E&E costs should be capitalized or expensed. IFRS 6 allows
companies to choose a policy that capitalizes these costs. The policy must be disclosed in the
notes to the financial statements.
The Company is currently evaluating its existing policy for E&E costs in the light of developments
in the extractive industries project that is currently ongoing.
Other IFRS
There are other IFRS that apply to the Company’s operations, but they are not expected to have
a significant effect on 2010 financial results based on the Company’s current and expected
activities. The Company is still considering the impact that the adoption of IFRS will have on its
financial statements.
16
OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA
The following is a summary of the Company’s outstanding share data as of August 10, 2010.
Common shares
A total of 155,558,884 common shares are outstanding.
Convertible securities
The Company now has 12,903,500 options outstanding.
Stock Options
A total of 12,903,500 stock options are issued and outstanding, with expiry dates ranging from
July 27, 2010 through to June 30, 2013. The weighted average exercise price for all stock
options is C$2.87. All stock options entitle the holders to purchase common shares of the
Company.
INTERNAL CONTROLS
Internal control over financial reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. Any system of internal control over financial reporting, no matter
how well designed, has inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation
and presentation.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the
period ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, internal control over financial reporting.
ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Additional sources of information regarding Nautilus Minerals Inc. are on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com
and is on the Company’s website www.nautilusminerals.com
.