Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: Spoiler Alert

I was going to 'not reply' since, of all the other talking points you could have brought up, you decided to bring up "taxes", and how can "any right thinking Amercan [sic] belive [sic]what ypu [sic] say about taxes?"

Let's see..... SCOTUS, to keep the law "constitutional", called it a "TAX".

Soetoro adamantly denied it was a "TAX", even arguing with the dictionary definition as brought up by that radical birther neocon racist anti-progressive right wingnut George Stephanopoulos. At least that's how you describe (ad infinitum) anyone that disagrees about anything the Dear Leader says.

Everyone BUT Soetoro (and probably Pelozi and Reid) KNEW it was a "TAX" but said it wasn't. Now that it has to be a TAX for the law to be 'constitutional' it's, BY GOLLY MR. TERWILLIGER, NOW A TAX!!!

Now how can any left or right thinking American NOT call it a TAX when it has been legally defined as a TAX, just like it said in the dictionary despite Soetoro's 'redefinition'?

As for "death panels', since Soetoro LIED about the TAX aspect, I'll say his credibility on that issue is sorely lacking..... based on FACT. I guess your next claim will be that under Obamakare everyone will get unlimited funds so as to never die. Yep, under Obamakare, even death has a kure. No one will ever die, because free healthkare won't add a single dime to anyone's TAXes so the program will not have to make any decision on who qualifies for healthkare at anytime or situation.

Accept it. The proven TRAITOR and LIAR is your Dear Leader.

Still waiting for you to thank Bush for appointing Roberts. It's the least you could do. Unless of course, you know that he is the singular person who has just sealed a Romney presidency..... which is why you now want to say Obamakare isn't a TAX.

And thanks for giving me the opportunity to googlebomb TAX 12 times.

...and just exactly how would the law being upheld be a victory for death panels since that's something those against the law are against to begin with? Why would one argue that point "for" as you have implied?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply