What's your point with this article Fat? Are you saying that because this article uses scary words like "violent rhetoric" and "apocalyptic language" that this person isn't responsible for themselves and their own actions? What does "violent rhetoric' mean? Would this person be no less responsible for their actions if the article had said "pretty pink flowers rhetoric"? I see some serious spin and excuse making here; making the big bad evil Foxnews responsible for this guys action; are you kidding me?

No wonder the left believes in and needs a nanny/welfare state; somebody has to take care of them and whipe their bottoms for them; obviosly they can't, nor desire to do it for themselves...

- 67GTO