i have read the pr several times and cannot find

the ``lameness in it``. Would you mind pointing out

what you feel was lame? i may have missed or overlooked

something.

The pr was necessary to relay the Casio distribution.

The fact that PTSC is aware of the price decline and

acknowledges this to the shareholder based on the fact that

license deals cant be issued as rapidly as we all had anticipated or hoped.

I liked the pr and thought that it was well written and

pretty much stated the obvious...TPL is agressively

seeking licensing. A long term holder would find the

pr informative and to the point....the ``trader`` wants

settlement news and without such news there will be a decline and any pr that does not contain a settlement

will be viewed by the ``trader`` as fluff.

i am interested in your opinion.

thanks

t`moto