Indeed, the board did loose it`s most valuable member when Brian quit posting. He had access to management, information and insight which he shared freely. He held management accountable by exposing their activities or lack there of. He relentlessly pressed for actions that would increase shareholder value. Brian is probably the biggest individual shareholder. Asking him to be on an advisory board was initially seen as a gesture that would give the common shareholders greater input (there are a lot of very smart people here and a wealth of ideas). Unfortunately, the net effect has been to cut us off from our best source of information and insight. If managements goal was to neutralize its most forceful critic then that goal has been accomplished completely. Ronran has stepped into the vacuum but posts cautiously and probably holds back some information. That is his prerogative. I do find it immensely frustrating when engineering types and lawyers play ``riddle me this`` with the smug attitude ``I`m smarter than you and this proves it``.

I`ve asked the board some very relevant questions and never gotten an answer...usually not even a response. For example, who are the major shareholder beside S&L?, What patents underpin Ignite/Inflame?,What is PTSC`s relationship (if any) to Intelysis? There were others. We have made and are going to make a lot more money on PTSC but to fully realize our potential we need a better grasp on what is here beyond the Moore portfolio. We need facts, not wild ass speculation.