We look at this through the eyes of long term veterans and what we perceive to be ``reasonable``. But on what are we basing this...from its meager beginnings and low points this stock has seen?

We`ve all seen it - stocks taking on a life of their own, growing from pennies and hitting the low 20`s...and then back again to the pennies. The right exposure from the right people/entities for that intitial ``push``...a frenzy takes over and pushes it higher. All kinda feeding on itself. Then a new set of eyes come in, make assessments about the company and add their 2cents - from there it comes back to reality, either sinking, swimming or floating.

I`m looking for a repeat pattern. They say History does repeat itself, eh? Here at .42 IMHO we aren`t even outta the blocks - We haven`t even made it on CNBC - once we do, then that`ll be the kiss of death ;-)

In my mind, it`s not about valuations or potential, it`s about the human nature of traders and the Market.

The only question left, is where we end up after the dust settles (i.e. the stock seeing it`s highs)...Pohl`s got the job now of trying to get some legs to attached to this company so we can sustain.

I agree with Ron, the right idea is to start selling on the way up, but a topic for discussion might be where does one reasonably set the initial sell point?...probably a matter of personal prefernce.

There are ``respected`` posters sitting over on RB evangelizing to the masses we have value of $3-5, ``conservatively``..think that doesn`t stick with some? Those seeds spread alone, condition a certain percentage of lurkers out there to propagate this ``belief`` to others...The market is based on information, some none at all that accurate.

Examples are endless, from my observations starting from the late 90`s through 2000 and beyond...

All IMHO - Have a good weekend.

Regards